|Year : 2022 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 131-137
The relationship between executive functions and interoceptive awareness in the elderly with perceived feelings of loneliness
Arpita Roy Choudhury1, Susmita Halder2
1 Department of Clinical Psychology, Amity University, Action Area II, Newtown, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
2 Department of Clinical Psychology, St. Xavier's University, Action Area III, B, Newtown, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
|Date of Submission||20-May-2022|
|Date of Decision||08-Aug-2022|
|Date of Acceptance||09-Aug-2022|
|Date of Web Publication||28-Sep-2022|
Ph.D Susmita Halder
West Bengal 700160
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Objectives: Older adults are more vulnerable to perceived feelings of loneliness which may lead to depression, cognitive decline, and an overall decrease in their quality of life. In the present study, the main objective was to compare executive functions and interoceptive awareness between the elderly with and without perceived feelings of loneliness. Methods: In the study, we recruited a sample of 100 study subjects (50 individuals with perceived feelings of loneliness and 50 healthy controls). UCLA 3-Item Loneliness Scale was used as a screening tool for loneliness. Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, Stroop Test, N Back Test (verbal and visual), and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test were used as measures of interoceptive awareness and executive functioning, respectively. Results: Significant difference was found between both the groups in working memory (p < 0.05) and set shifting ability (p < 0.01). In interoceptive awareness, significant difference was found between both the groups in the domains of significantly high on not distracting (t = 5.723, p < 0.01), significantly less on not worrying (t = 2.028, p < 0.05), significantly less on body listening (t = 2.302, p < 0.05), and significantly less on trusting (t = 4.630, p < 0.01). Conclusion: To understand the possible neuropsychological mechanism of loneliness may help conceptualize a better intervention plan for those with perceived feelings of loneliness to prevent progression to severe psychological problems and cognitive decline.
Keywords: older adults, UCLA 3-Item Loneliness Scale, Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, Wisconsin Card-sorting Test
|How to cite this article:|
Choudhury AR, Halder S. The relationship between executive functions and interoceptive awareness in the elderly with perceived feelings of loneliness. Taiwan J Psychiatry 2022;36:131-7
|How to cite this URL:|
Choudhury AR, Halder S. The relationship between executive functions and interoceptive awareness in the elderly with perceived feelings of loneliness. Taiwan J Psychiatry [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Dec 3];36:131-7. Available from: http://www.e-tjp.org/text.asp?2022/36/3/131/357342
| Introduction|| |
Loneliness is a subjective emotional state. Feelings of loneliness may be present in any age group. But it is more prevalent for adolescents and the elderly. The prevalence of loneliness is found to be higher among those older adults who are male, lives alone, has no spouse, and has poor emotional support. These feelings can trigger a depressive syndrome. The elderly with depressive features are also at a considerable risk for suicidal behaviors. It often manifests in the elderly and often goes unnoticed. Loneliness is one of the most frequent complaints among the elderly.
Cognitive functioning declines with age, and it is important to differentiate between normal age-related cognitive changes and symptoms of any degenerative disease. Preliminary research evidence indicated that loneliness in the elderly is associated with cognitive decline which may progress to dementia including Alzheimer's disease. In a study with the largest sample size (N = 13,176), a negative association between loneliness and executive function (EF) has been found. Thus, recent evidence indicated that loneliness in the elderly is associated with poorer cognitive function.
Maturational dualism indicates that the weakening of mind–body connections with age can influence emotional experiences. The internal surface of the body is referred to as interoception. Interoceptive awareness is a relatively new concept which is defined as the interpretation of bodily sensations at the conscious level.
Understanding of internal bodily states and their representations and also being aware of these bodily sensations are related to emotional experiences and cognitive functions. Interoception involves multiple components such as different markers at neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, hemodynamic, cognitive, and behavioral levels.
Executive functioning such as set shifting ability is an important concept in interoceptive awareness because those with good interoceptive ability can focus on all the internal bodily sensations, and this requires the constant shifting and manipulation of information between external and internal cues to interpret social situations. Thus, cognitive functioning is an important mechanism in interoceptive processing. The loss of ability to detect internal states can make older people rely more on their environmental cues.
Thus, the clinical implication of interoceptive awareness is that understanding internal bodily states may help better understand emotional states. Thus, any disruption of internal states or the ability to understand these internal states may have an effect on emotional control. Difficulties in anticipating interoceptive states and their changes can be linked to different disorders, especially mood and anxiety disorders.
Thus, to understand whether there is any underlying dysregulation of interoception which may be related to loneliness in the aging population is important. In addition, since perception of a social situation as well as internal bodily states requires cognitive functioning, understanding EFs in relation to interoception is an important area of research. In the present study, the objective was to compare EFs and interoceptive awareness between the elderly with perceived feelings of loneliness and control group. Additional objective was to understand whether EFs and interoceptive awareness can predict feelings of loneliness in older adults.
| Methods|| |
This was a cross-sectional study conducted on older people within the age range of 60–75 years. The study included two groups of participants. Group I comprised 50 older adults with perceived feelings of loneliness, and Group II comprised 50 older adults without feelings of loneliness. To be included in the study, the participants were required to be aged 60–75 years with at least 10 years of education and residing in Kolkata. Those with neurological or psychological disorders, geriatric depression, cognitive impairment, and physical disability were excluded from the study. Furthermore, older adults who were currently working or institutionalized were also excluded from the study.
A pool of 187 individuals was drawn using purposive sampling method, and they were assessed using the screening tools. Those who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Based on their scores on UCLA 3-Item Loneliness Scale, they were divided into Group I (with loneliness, n = 50) and Group II (without loneliness, n = 50) [Figure 1]. The institutional ethics committee approved the study (Ref No. = DRC-AIBHAS/ETHICS/A95210919001, and date of approval = May 21, 2021), with the requirement to obtain written consent from all study participants.
UCLA 3-Item Loneliness Scale
The short version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale (3 items) was developed for large multilevel study of social isolation and health in the aging process. This scale was used to screen the elderly with loneliness. The alpha coefficient of reliability is 0.72. The scale is a screening tool for loneliness which measures three aspects of loneliness: social connectedness, relational connectedness, and self-perceived isolation. Those who scored within 3–5 are grouped as “not lonely” and those who scored within 6–9 are grouped as “lonely.”
General Health Questionnaire–28
General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) is a screening test that can be self-administered. GHQ is aimed at assessing short-term changes in mental health. It was designed as a state measure. Its sensitivity was found to be 0.80 and specificity 0.88. Scoring was done using GHQ method (0-0-1-1).
Mini-Mental State Examination
The Mini-Mental State Examination is administered to screen for cognitive impairment and to estimate the severity of cognitive impairment among the elderly. It includes various tests such as orientation, attention, memory, language, and visual-spatial skills. It was shown to have good test–retest reliability (0.80–0.95). A score of 24 or above (out of 30) indicates a normal cognition.
Geriatric Depression Scale-15
The short form of Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) comprising 15 items (GDS-15) is administered to screen elderly with depression. The alpha coefficient of the 15-item Short Form was only 0.82, indicating moderate internal consistency. Each answer is scored 1 based on the scoring norms. A total of 5 or more suggests depression.
Multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness
The scale is applicable to people above 18 years of age and is used to assess interoceptive awareness. The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA)-2 consists of 37 items and 8 domains. The domains are noticing, not distracting, not worrying, attention regulation, emotional awareness, self-regulation, as well as body listening and trusting. Internal-consistency reliabilities of MAIA ranged from 0.66 to 0.82. It is a five-point scale. The total score is obtained for each domain, and then, their average is calculated to obtain the final score for each domain.
The Stroop Test – National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS, India) version is used to assess response inhibition and attentional control. The reading time subtracted from the naming time was used to get the Stroop effect score. The reading time was used to assess attentional control.
The 1-back and 2-back versions of the verbal and visual N back test were used to assess working memory (WM). The test was taken from the NIMHANS Neuropsychological Battery for adults. The number of correct responses formed the score in each test. The higher the score, better the performance.
Wisconsin Card-sorting Test
Set shifting ability is tested using the Wisconsin Card-sorting Test. This test is to examine various facets of cognition such as concept formation and the ability to shift cognitive strategies in response to changing environments. The administration and scoring of the test were based on the NIMHANS Neuropsychological Battery for adults.
Continuous variables were evaluated in the form of mean and standard deviation (SD), and ordinal and nominal variables were evaluated in the form of frequencies with percentages. Student's t-test was used to compare both the groups in EFs and interoceptive awareness. Regression analysis was done to understand the significant predictors of loneliness.
Statistical analysis was carried out using the International Business Machine Statistical Package for the Social Science version 20 for Windows (IBM SPSS, Inc., Armonk, New York, USA). The differences between groups were considered significant if p-values were smaller than 0.05.
| Results|| |
[Table 1] compares the sociodemographic variables of the groups with perceived feelings of loneliness (Group A) and without perceived feelings of loneliness (Group B). The mean age of the older adults with perceived feelings of loneliness was higher than that of the control group. The number of males with perceived feelings of loneliness was higher than females. Furthermore, those staying alone and the number of widow/widower were higher in the group with feelings of loneliness compared to healthy controls [Table 1].
|Table 1: Comparisons of the sociodemographic variables of the groups with perceived feelings of loneliness (Group A) and without perceived feelings of loneliness (Group B)|
Click here to view
[Table 2] shows the comparisons of the clinical variables of the elderly with perceived feelings of loneliness (Group A) and the elderly without perceived feelings of loneliness (Group B). The clinical details of both groups were presented in mean ± SD.
|Table 2: Comparisons of the clinical variables of the elderly with perceived feelings of loneliness (Group A) and the elderly without perceived feelings of loneliness (Group B)|
Click here to view
[Table 3] compares the variables of executive functioning for the elderly with perceived feelings of loneliness (Group A) and the elderly without perceived feelings of loneliness (Group B). As shown in executive functioning domains, significant differences were found in set shifting ability on the measures of total errors (t = 5.709, p < 0.01), perseverative response (t = 6.735, p < 0.01), nonperseverative errors (t = 4.815, p < 0.01), and conceptual responses (t = 5.594, p < 0.01) on WCST. Total error (42.28 ± 29.14 vs. 16.06 ± 14.31) and nonperseverative errors (29.35 ± 22.48 vs. 11.37 ± 13.83) were significantly higher in the group with loneliness (p < 0.001). The conceptual level response and categories completed were significantly lower in the elderly with loneliness (p < 0.001). Furthermore, significant difference has been found in Stroop reading time (t = 2.460, p < 0.05) and on attentional control where group with loneliness scored higher than control group. Significant difference has also been found in WM for both verbal and visual WM on N back 1 and 2 (p < 0.05) except on visual N back 1 misses. Group with loneliness has higher errors or misses on N Back Test compared to control group [Table 3].
|Table 3: Comparison of the variables of executive functioning for the elderly with perceived feelings of loneliness (Group A) and the elderly without perceived feelings of loneliness (Group B)|
Click here to view
[Table 4] compares the domains of interoceptive awareness for the elderly with perceived feelings of loneliness (Group A) and the elderly without perceived feelings of loneliness (Group B). Interoceptive awareness scale had eight subscales totally. Significant differences were found on four domains that is on not distracting (t = 5.723, p < 0.001), not worrying (t = 2.028, p < 0.05), body listening (t = 2.302, p < 0.05), and trusting (t = 4.630, p < 0.001). Group with loneliness was significantly scored higher on not distracting domain and significantly lower on the other three domains compared to control group. On the domain of noticing, loneliness group was scored higher than control group. But on domains of attention regulation, emotional awareness, and self-regulation, group with loneliness were scored lower than control group [Table 4].
|Table 4: Comparisons of the domains of interoceptive awareness for the elderly with perceived feelings of loneliness (Group A) and the elderly without perceived feelings of loneliness (Group B)|
Click here to view
[Table 5] compares the possible neuropsychological predictors of loneliness using linear regression model. We found that the hits on visual N back 2 test which is a measure of visual WM (VWM) was a significant possible neuropsychological predictor of loneliness (p < 0.05) in the present study.
|Table 5: Comparison of the possible neuropsychological predictors of loneliness|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
In this present study, we compared the perceived feelings of loneliness of the elderly with those of with control group in assessed executive functioning and interoceptive awareness in an attempt to understand the possible neuropsychological predictor of loneliness in elderly people. Socioeconomic challenges such as high poverty, high dependency ratio, and unplanned urbanization increase the likelihood of loneliness among the Indian population. In addition, cultural factors such as marital status, family structure, and religious practices have an impact on loneliness. But not all the elderly experience loneliness. Thus, the current study focused on understanding the possible underlying mechanism of loneliness in the elderly through taking into account of executive functioning and interoceptive awareness.
The study results showed that those with perceived feelings of loneliness scored significantly lower on measures of executive functioning [Table 3] and domains of interoceptive awareness [Table 4] compared to control group. As shown in [Table 5], VWM was found to be a possible neuropsychological predictor of loneliness (p < 0.05). Thus, there was a significant difference between both the groups in terms of executive functioning and interoceptive awareness. Therefore, the current study results showed that the processing of information among those with loneliness was different from that of the control group, and they also have poorer interoceptive awareness.
In the present study, significant difference between both the groups were found in WM (p < 0.05) and set shifting ability (p < 0.01) domains of executive functioning [Table 3]. EFs such as WM, focusing, shifting, problem solving and inhibition plays an important role in forming a successful social interaction which often requires active understanding of another person's beliefs, expectations, emotions, and also to focus, solve problems and inhibit inappropriate behaviors.
Those with perceived feelings of loneliness tend to focus only on those negative cues that indicate social rejection, and they develop a negative expectation about the way they are perceived by others. Thus, loneliness can lead to a cycle of negative interactions where lonely people stick to their beliefs that social life is unrewarding and negative,. Thus, it can be said that those with loneliness have difficulty in perceiving and shifting between different social situations and tends to focus only on the negative aspects of social situations.
WM is recruited in social interaction when people draw inferences about others' emotional reactions. During social interaction, a constant manipulation of information is important, and also, a constant shifting between one's own emotions and the other person's emotional cues, facial cues, and gestures is required. In the current study [Table 5], those with loneliness were found significantly to have impaired WM (p < 0.05).
In the current study [Table 5], VWM was also found to be a significant possible neuropsychological predictor of loneliness (p < 0.05). In social interactions, faces and facial expressions and socio-affective stimuli are processed and maintained in VWM. Different socially relevant information is likely to interact with the facial memory representations. Facial expressions can also provide information on other's affective states and on the environment. People with loneliness tend to perceive angry faces more readily than happy faces. Thus, they generally perceive more of social threats and negative emotions. Existing evidence has shown that impairments in WM and inhibition processes reduce with normal aging and these factors are associated with self-monitoring and self-regulation of emotions, impulsivity control, and anticipation of behavioral consequences. Thus, through this self-monitoring mechanism, WM contribute to the development of perceived loneliness. Thus, deficit in VWM may lead to problems in social interaction and relations. In the present study, the scores on VWM were also found to be lower for the loneliness group compared to healthy controls.
In the present study [Table 4], those with loneliness scored significantly higher on not distracting (3.36 ± 1.17 vs. 2.05 ± 1.12, p < 0.001) and significantly lower on not worrying (2.04 ± 1.02 vs. 2.43 ± 0.88, p < 0.05) domains. Relating this finding with the enhanced emotional discernment hypothesis, it can be said that because they have poorer interoceptive awareness compared to healthy controls and they focus more on their negative sensations, they tend to experience more negative emotions which may increase their feelings of loneliness.
Because it is known that with aging the mind body connection weakens (maturational dualism) and this influences emotional experiences, they have to rely more on their external environment for information about internal states. Thus, in the present study [Table 4], those with loneliness scored significantly less on body listening (1.99 ± 1.08 vs. 2.45 ± 0.90, p < 0.05) and significantly less on trusting (3.77 ± 0.62 vs. 4.30 ± 0.50, p < 0.01). However, from the social needs model of loneliness, it is also known that they focus on only negative cues that signal rejection and also have a negative expectation about the way they are perceived by others. Thus, while taking information from external environment about internal bodily states, they are focusing on negative cues and thus perceiving negative bodily sensations, leading to more negative emotional experiences.
Thus, the overall findings on interoceptive awareness and executive function indicate that those with feelings of loneliness may have impaired ability to shift themselves away from negative social cues and they also have difficulty in manipulating information during social interactions, leading to increased feelings of loneliness. They may also include information from external environment to understand their internal states and use both these information for interpreting emotional experiences. Thus, the process and the link between these two variables in loneliness can be explained by a hypothetical model [Figure 2].
|Figure 2: Diagrammatic demonstration of the connection between interoceptive awareness and executive functioning in perceived feelings of loneliness|
Click here to view
Further, from the neurobiological perspective, it has been proposed that insular cortex (IC) is the main cortical area responsible for interoceptive awareness. The ICs are bidirectionally connected to the cingulate, prefrontal, parietal, and medial temporal cortices and subcortically to basal ganglia. The anterior IC is strongly connected with the anterior cingulate cortex which is involved in the functioning of cognitive flexibility. Cognitive flexibility also involves the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC), basal ganglia, and posterior parietal cortex. In an fMRI study, it was found that there was an activation of visual cortex which is involved in the functioning of working memory in the lonely people when they were exposed to unpleasant pictures.
Thus, those with loneliness may be unable to manipulate information during social interaction which is a function of working memory (PFC and visual cortex) and may have difficulty in flexibly shifting between positive and negative cues of a social situation which is a function of cognitive flexibility.
Over-interpretation of the results must be avoided because this study has two major limitations:
- The sample for this study was drawn using purposive sampling technique and a cross-sectional study design was used. Therefore, the generalizability of the study results can be compromised.
- A better neuropsychological measure of response inhibition in context of social interactions could have yielded better results.
It is observed from the current study results that those with perceived feelings of loneliness have impaired set shifting ability and WM which impairs their information processing and manipulation in social situations and this finding is strengthened by their lowered interoceptive awareness. Thus, the implication of the present study is that the current findings can help understand the possible neuropsychological mechanism, leading to loneliness which calls for effective intervention strategy for this subclinical group. Every individual experiences feelings of loneliness in their life. Some people are able to cope with it effectively, but some people cannot. The difference thus may lie in the underlying processing of information. Thus, the intervention strategy for feelings of loneliness in older adults may include both counseling and cognitive exercise to enhance their information processing ability in social situations.
Future studies should focus on using interoceptive awareness and its rôle in theory of mind in the elderly with perceived feelings of loneliness. Studies can also focus on understanding the neuropsychological correlates of the progression from loneliness to depression to mild cognitive impairment.
| Financial Support and Sponsorship|| |
| Conflicts of Interest|| |
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest in writing this paper.
| References|| |
Neto F, Pinto M: The role of loneliness, gender and love status in adolescents' love styles. Int J Adolesc Youth
2003; 11: 191.
Huang PH, Chi MJ, Kuo CL, et al.: Prevalence of loneliness and related factors among older adults in Taiwan: evidence from a nationally representative survey. Inquiry
2021; 58: 469580211035745.
Halder S, Manot S: Identifying suicidal risk and its association with depression in the elderly population. J Geriatr Ment Health
2020; 7: 29-32.
de Aguiar Sá Azeredo Z, Neto-Afonso MA: Loneliness from the perspective of the elderly. Rev Bras Geriatr Gerontol
2016; 19: 70-8.
Halder S, Mahato AK: Cognition in ageing: implications for assessment and intervention. In: Prasad BV, Akbar S editors. Handbook of Research on Geriatric Health, Treatment, and Care
. India: IGI Global, 2018. p. 118-32.
Cacioppo JT, Hawkley LC: Perceived social isolation and cognition. Trends Cogn Sci
2009; 13: 447-54.
Gierveld JD, Van Tilburg T: A 6-item scale for overall, emotional, and social loneliness confirmatory tests on survey data. Res Aging
2006; 28: 582-98.
Sherrington CS: The Integrative Action of the Nervous System
. New Haven, Conneticuts, USA: Yale University Press, 1906.
Herbert BM, Pollatos O: The body in the mind: on the relationship between interoception and embodiment. Top Cogn Sci
2012; 4: 692-704.
Tsakiris M, Critchley H: Interoception beyond homeostasis: Affect, cognition and mental health. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
2016; 371: 20160002.
Gray MA, Harrison NA, Wiens S, et al.: Modulation of emotional appraisal by false physiological feedback during fMRI. PLoS One
2007; 2: e546.
Paulus MP, Stein MB: Interoception in anxiety and depression. Brain Struct Funct
2010; 214: 451-63.
Hughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, et al.: A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: results from two population-based studies. Res Aging
2004; 26: 655-72.
Goldberg DP, Hillier VF: A scaled version of the general health questionnaire. Psychol Med
1979; 9: 139-45.
Mehling WE, Price C, Daubenmier JJ, et al.: The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA). PLoS One
2012; 7: e48230.
Tiwari SC: Loneliness: a disease? Indian J Psychiatry
2013; 55: 320-2.
Ybarra O, Burnstein E, Winkielman P, et al.: Mental exercising through simple socializing: social interaction promotes general cognitive functioning. Pers Soc Psychol Bull
2008; 34: 248-59.
Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT: Loneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med
2010; 40: 218-27.
Newall N, Chipperfield J, Rodney C, et al.: Causal beliefs, social participation, and loneliness among older adults: a longitudinal study. J Soc Pers Relat
2009; 26: 273-90.
Gambarota F, Sessa P: Visual working memory for faces and facial expressions as a useful “Tool” for understanding social and affective cognition. Front Psychol
2019; 10: 2392.
Adolphs R: Recognizing emotion from facial expressions: psychological and neurological mechanisms. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev
2002; 1: 21-62.
Zhou Z, Mao F, Zhang W, et al.: The association between loneliness and cognitive impairment among older men and women in China: a nationwide longitudinal study. Int J Environ Res Public Health
2019; 16: e2877.
Schmeichel BJ, Volokhov RN, Demaree HA: Working memory capacity and the self-regulation of emotional expression and experience. J Pers Soc Psychol
2008; 95: 1526-40.
Sin E, Shao R, Lee TM: The executive control correlate of loneliness in healthy older people. Aging Ment Health
2021; 25: 1224-31.
Barrett LF, Bliss-Moreau E: Affect as a psychological primitive. Adv Exp Soc Psychol
2009; 41: 167-218.
Archibald F, Bartholomew K, Marx R: Loneliness in early adolescence: a test of the cognitive discrepancy model of loneliness. Pers Soc Psychol Bull
1995; 21: 296-301.
Deen B, Pitskel NB, Pelphrey KA: Three systems of insular functional connectivity identified with cluster analysis. Cereb Cortex
2011; 21: 1498-506.
Leber AB, Turk-Browne NB, Chun MM: Neural predictors of moment-to-moment fluctuations in cognitive flexibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2008; 105: 13592-7.
Cacioppo JT, Norris CJ, Decety J, et al.: In the eye of the beholder: Individual differences in perceived social isolation predict regional brain activation to social stimuli. J Cogn Neurosci
2009; 21: 83-92.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]